Reggie Littlejohn on WHO, globalist overreach, and what’s next

Guest Avail: Reggie Littlejohn, Esq

President & Founder, antiglobalist.net

President & Founder, womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org

I’m reaching out to suggest Reggie Littlejohn, human‑rights attorney and lead drafter of the Anti‑Globalist International Manifesto, for a timely, hard‑hitting segment on what she calls the “globalist coup” behind the World Health Organization and related U.N. bodies. With the U.S. having officially withdrawn from the WHO this year, audiences are asking: Who’s really in charge of global health policy now, and what does that mean for American sovereignty, medical freedom, and future “emergency” powers?

Reggie connects the dots in plain language between the WHO’s expanded pandemic agenda, the U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals and “One Health” framework, and the push for a technocratic system that could combine digital IDs, central bank digital currencies, and social‑credit style scoring to control dissent. She argues this isn’t theoretical: the world just lived through the “China Model” of lockdowns, mandates, and passports—and the same unelected institutions are quietly building the legal tools to do it again, on a larger scale.

Suggested Top Talking Points:

• Is the WHO becoming a “global health government”?
  • How proposed WHO instruments, emergency platforms, and pandemic arrangements could override or pressure national constitutions and elected governments in a crisis.
• “Never again” to 2020–21 – or are we setting up a replay?
  • Why Reggie says new WHO/UN powers would lock in the worst parts of the COVID response—lockdowns, “one‑size‑fits‑all” mandates, and censorship of dissenting experts.
• Medical freedom, the Nuremberg Code, and experimental shots.
  • Why she believes mandates for novel genetic therapies violate informed consent, and why injury and excess‑mortality data demand public, uncensored debate.
• From ESG to CBDCs: the financial side of the “global coup.”
  • How ESG rules, a potential central bank digital currency, and AI‑driven surveillance could be merged into an economic “kill switch” for anyone who defies the official narrative.
• A positive alternative: national sovereignty and citizens pushing back.
  • What lawmakers, governors, and ordinary viewers can do now—opt‑outs, state‑level protections, and international alliances to defend borders, families, and faith.

Why she works well on TV:

Reggie is a sharp, forceful communicator who frames complex globalist architecture in concrete, audience‑friendly terms

“Who decides if your church closes again?”

“Could your bank account be frozen for refusing a shot?”

… and she does it without jargon. She gives you both a strong warning and a constructive roadmap, which makes for compelling television and robust viewer engagement.

I’d be glad to coordinate availability and tailor the angle to fit your rundown—whether that’s a 5–7 minute segment on WHO overreach, a debate with a pro‑WHO guest, or a longer-form conversation tying global governance to election‑year stakes.